Thursday, April 14, 2005

Circuit Rejects Defendant's Effort to Assert Standing to Challenge Search of Stash House by Relying Only on Government's Allegations

United States v. Watson, Docket No. 03-1709 (2d Cir. April 12, 2005) (Kearse, Cabranes, Korman) (Op. by Cabranes): In Watson, the Circuit affirms a district court's denial, pre-hearing, of a defendant's motion to suppress the fruits of an allegedly illegal search of a residence. The decision is noteworthy for practitioners because it limits a defendant's ability to challenge a search where he is unwilling (usually for strategic reasons) to claim that he owned or occupied the place where the evidence was seized -- i.e., that he had "a legitimate expectation of privacy in the invaded place." Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (1978).

The defendant in this case, Roger Watson, was charged with a series of drug and gun offenses based, in part, on evidence seized pursuant to a search of a basement apartment located at 33-18 Fish Avenue in the Bronx. The defendant moved to suppress the evidence seized during the apartment search, claiming that the search warrant was deficient in some respect (the opinion doesn't spell out how). But rather than having the defendant allege in his affidavit that he owned or lived in the Fish Avenue apartment -- something he presumably wasn't keen to fess up to given what was found there -- the defense tried to rely exclusively on the government's theory of the case to establish his standing to challenge the search. The defense explained in an attorney affirmation that the warrant itself stated that the apartment was used by an individual named "J.D. Scullarchi," and that (1) the superceding indictment listed "Skilarchie" as an a/k/a for Watson, and (2) a Marshal's form provided to the defendant in discovery listed the Fish Avenue apartment as one of Watson's prior residences. Finally, the attorney affirmation made the general claim that "Roger Watson would have an expectation of privacy and, as such standing to contest a search pursuant to a search warrant which authorized the search of his person as well as his residence or former residence."

The defendant was in something of a catch 22, obviously: He wanted to challenge the propriety of the search of a stash house, which the government was going to claim belonged to him, without admitting under oath that it was his. The district court rejected the defendant's effort, holding that a hearing wasn't necessary because the defendant had failed to meet his burden of proving that he had an expectation of privacy in the place searched. The Circuit agreed, noting that the factual claims in the attorney affirmation were insufficient: "That the search warrant listed a person who may be defendant among those who 'utilized' 33-18 Fish Avenue does not come close to showing that defendant 'owned the premises or that he occupied them and has dominion and control over them by leave of the owner.'" (Quoting United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990)). The panel also seemed distressed by the fact that, at trial, the defendant offered testimony to the effect that he did not reside at the Fish Avenue apartment; in other words, that he was trying to have his cake and eat it too.

The take-away is that a defendant cannot "challenge the search of a residence merely because he anticipated that the Government will link the objects recovered in that search to defendant at trial." But while a defendant cannot have it both ways, the government can. Here, the government presumably opposed the suppression motion on the ground that the defendant had not alleged that he used the apartment, even though the government intended to prove at trial that he had. Because the defendant has the burden of proof in establishing standing, he is the one who has to make the choice.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

14 February 2005

United States Court of Appeals
Judicial Council of the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall US Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007

RE: Resubmission of Complaint of Misconduct
Judicial Council of the Second Circuit
Case: Hall v. The New York Presbyterian Hospital, et al
USSD 00 CIV.7858

Dear Clerk:

As a practicing physician, born and trained in the United States of America, and board certified by the American Board of Family Medicine, I am held accountable for my professional actions. As a representative of my chosen profession, I am not only responsible to the patients I treat, but I am expected to adhere to an ideal, one that is called the Hippocratic Oath to ensure my patients receive the best care I possibly can deliver. It is understood that the same ethical and expert standards that apply to the medical profession also apply to the legal profession as well. Therefore, it is only natural that the following complaint be viewed only from the perspective of governance of the federal judiciary and management of federal law.

It is my firm belief that the Honorable Judge George Daniels, civil servant of the United States, agent of the United States federal judiciary, and lifetime member of the United States Southern District Court has violated his professional duties and must be held accountable to the American public. It is the belief of many that he has acted inappropriately and incompetently while presiding over Hall v. The New York Presbyterian Hospital, et al as he has treated these claims with extreme carelessness and negligence amounting to “judicial malpractice”.

It is inconceivable that a federal judge can ignore the official overtures of representing counsel. This has occurred in my case. It is morally unjust to require the filing of a lawsuit to force a ruling by a judge. This has occurred in my case. As well, one cannot comprehend how the federal court system can allow a member the federal judiciary to professionally lapse and allow an American citizen to be placed in an unacceptable and indeterminate state. This has occurred in my case. Moreover, it is unconscionable that this agent of the American government has not been held accountable for his actions. Honorable Judge George Daniels’ behavior is not only unacceptable, but also reprehensible. It must be documented that my civil rights as an American citizen were carelessly abandoned not only by my previous employer, but also by the very federal legal system designed to fairly resolve such disputes. Clearly, my constitutional entitlement to a fair judicial examination was abandoned. This District Court and Honorable Judge George Daniels’ actions have cast a great shadow on the American legal system and triggered a great number of personal, psychological and financial traumas. The Judicial Council of the Second Circuit must address these issues.

Please allow me to indulge the Judicial Council of the Second Circuit for a moment and provide some background for my complaint.

During the summer of 1997, while serving as chief ophthalmic resident and a graduate medical education member at The New York Presbyterian Hospital (“Hospital”), Petitioner witnessed several acts of racial prejudice and medical misconduct committed by senior medical staff against black Americans.

Within days, after verbally informing Petitioner’s chief-of-service, Dr. D. Jackson Coleman, MD, and program director, Kip Dolphin, MD, that an outer-borough black child did not receive timely and compassionate treatment from hospital surgeons for a traumatic penetrating eye injury, Petitioner was presented a fait accompli and asked to resign or face termination. Petitioner had previous been warned that previous comments regarding racial discrimination and medical negligence were not acceptable, and there was displeasure within the hospital staff regarding a written memo, in which Petitioner detailed why black patients did not receive adequate medical care at the hands of white hospital medical staff.

1) On October 17, 1997, unwilling to resign, Petitioner was summarily terminated from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (“ACGME”) approved ophthalmology residency position.

2) During April 1998 Petitioner brought forward a breach of contract complaint with the New York State Supreme Court based on a contractual obligation the Hospital had failed to obey by disregarding important employment bylaws while terminating Petitioner’s employment and disregarding a contractual obligation to provide adequate staffing and medical training based on ACGME approved guidelines.

3) On June 21, 1999, Judge Sheila Abdus-Salaam of the New York State Supreme Court dismissed the claims based a failure to go before the New York State Public Health Council (“PHC”). A state review board comprised of twelve (12) lay and professional New York State residents enacted by New York Public Health Law 2801-b. (NY Sup. Ct. docket no. 6020395/98)

4) After discussions with numerous attorneys, Petitioner was advised that as a member of the Hospital’s “graduate medical education”, or effectively a “medical student”, Petitioner would receive no resolution, as the PHC was purely designed to hear disputes between “credentialed hospital staff members” and hospital administration. Furthermore, the PHC was unable to offer any administrative remedy.

4) On October 14, 1999 Petitioner submitted an Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act claim ("EMTALA"), regarding two points, a) maintenance of physician-on-call lists and information on physicians who refuse or fail to appear to provide timely stabilizing treatment and b) protection for "whistle-blowers" who report a violation of the regulations, as well as a 42 U.S.C. § 1981 claim.

5) After initial arguments, a full disclosure revealed that District Court Judge Jed Rakoff had a conflict of interest with the case, as this was officially entered as part of the court record. At the time, the judge was affiliated with Cornell University; Petitioner’s attorney, Ambrose Wotorson, requested that he recuse himself and appoint a new judge, the judge refused.

6) On February 24, 2000, the District Court dismissed, without prejudice, the EMTALA claim for failure to proceed before the PHC. A copy of the opinion is attached as Exhibit A.

7) a) In July 2000, Petitioner provided a written complaint to the PHC and the Hospital provided a response. A copy of the complaint is attached as Exhibit B.
b) Additionally, in July 2000, Petitioner also communicated the same claim to the New York office of the Equal Employment and Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of for Civil Rights. A copy of the letters is attached as Exhibit C.

8) On September 22, 2000, Petitioner was provided a full crediting and affirmation of civil rights violations claims by the PHC. A copy of the opinion is attached as Exhibit D.

9) On October 16, 2000, Petitioner attorney filed a suit against defendants alleging violations of 42 U. S. C. § 1981 and various state and local laws. Abruptly, the District Court Judge Jed Rakoff inexplicably recused himself from the case and appointed District Court Judge George Daniels.

10) Between November and December 2000, the Hospital provided false and malicious information regarding medical qualifications and skills to a prospective employer, in total contradiction to the findings of the PHC.

11) On December 13, 2000, the Hospital filed a 12(b)(6) Motion seeking to dismiss the complaint for failure to plead a prima facie case of discrimination and retaliation.

12) On April 6, 2001 Petitioner submitted a formal request to amend the complaint after receipt of a right-to-sue letter from EEOC. In January 2001 the EEOC provided Petitioner with a right-to-sue letter under Title VII civil rights law. A copy of the letter is attached as Exhibit E.

13) On July 4, 2001 Petitioner submitted a formal complaint of misconduct to the Judicial Council of the Second Circuit regarding the aberrant actions of Judge Jed Rakoff. (Docket no. 01-8568)

14) On November 18, 2003, a writ of mandamus was served by Petitioner’s attorney to the Second Circuit Appeals Court causing the District Court, by judgment dated December 5, 2003, to dismiss Petitioner’s claim under 42 U. S. C. § 1981 for failure to state a claim.

15) On July 13, 2004, Petitioner’s attorney filed a timely notice of appeal contesting the validity of the district court’s findings. A copy of the appeal is attached as Exhibit F.

16) On November 23, 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit entered an order affirming the district court decision. A copy of the opinion is attached as Exhibit G.

17) On December 13, 2004, Petitioner submitted a formal complaint of misconduct to the Judicial Council of the Second Circuit regarding the actions of Judge George Daniels. Please refer to the New York Times article “Judges Decisions Draw Notice, For Being Conspicuously Late”, Dec 6, 2004. A copy of the article is attached as Exhibit H.

It is crystal clear, after mandates from New York State Supreme Court and the United States Southern District Court to seek review by the New York State Public Health Council; my complaints were thoroughly investigated in July 2000. Consequently, my allegations were fully credited and during September 2000 the council established that the New York Presbyterian Hospital and Drs. Dolphin and Coleman on two points:

(1) "Committed an improper practice by terminating Dr. Hall's clinical privileges" and (2) "the council determined the Hospital's actions was not based on principles of patient care, patient welfare, practitioner character or competence, and/or the objectives of the institution." (PHC letter dated September 22, 2000)

After receiving this patent victory against the Hospital, the case was reintroduced into the federal court system, again under the auspices of Judge Jed Rakoff. Abruptly, Judge Rakoff then recused himself without explanation after my attorney again raised the issue of a conflict of interest between his senior position with Cornell School of Law and my previous employer, Cornell Medical University, who was named a defendant in my case. Judge Rakoff unprecedented and aberrant behavior was raised with complaint of misconduct on July 4, 2001 with the Judicial Council of the Second Circuit (Docket No. 01-8568).

Shortly thereafter, Judge George Daniels was appointed to my case. After satisfying Judge Jed Rakoff’s request to seek review before the New York State Public Health Council, and receiving a Title VII right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment and Opportunity Commission, my case was placed in a state of limbo. After almost three years of inaction and stating at oral argument that he would resolve a 12(b)(6) Motion “quickly” the case continue to face total inaction. In fact, my attorney was hamstrung by the Judge Daniels and forced to write “pleas” for discussion with Judge George Daniels and place phone calls that were causally dismissed, ignored and never returned. To our dismay, the District Court eventually required a writ of mandamus to finally issue any statement at all. It is important to note after the writ was filed, within a period of two weeks, Judge Daniels threw out my long-standing claims after years of delay, inaction and abandonment. The case was never allowed to proceed to discovery.

It is obvious that my civil rights claims contained within, Hall v. The New York Presbyterian Hospital, et al., (Southern District Court Index No. 00 CIV. 7858), were treated by the District Court with an absence of ordinary care.

I base this information on several facts and have enclosed documents to support my allegations.

1) Approximately one year ago, the Southern District Court (Honorable Judge George Daniels) granted defendants' motion to dismiss the case against The New York Presbyterian Hospital and Drs. Coleman and Dolphin. In an order dated December 5, 2003, the District Court held that my pleadings were legally deficient, "nowhere in his complaint…does Dr. Hall claim that he…specifically complained of disparate treatment provided to blacks as compared to white, or that the issue of race was ever discussed in connection with is patient’s care or his complaints about their treatment.” Moreover, the District Court held that the complaint made “no factual allegations that the white senior physicians were actually made aware that the patient in question was black, that senior physicians who failed to assist Dr. Hall were aware that the patient in question was black, that a departure from the standard of care occurred because the patient was black.” This issue is critical as we had submitted and affidavit attesting to this fact, yet Judge Daniels disallowed this evidence form becoming part of the legal record.

It is my claim that the District Court failed to appreciate a significant lower court ruling, primarily the New York State Public Health Council crediting my complaint against the New York Presbyterian Hospital in September 2000. It is my belief that this vital information was improperly disregarded by the District Court thwarting my claims. The substance of the complaint, in which I brought against the New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell Medical University, regarded the hospital terminating my professional privileges under the 2801-b provision of New York State Public Health Law. It is the New York State Public Health Council’s opinion the hospital, ophthalmology department chairman and program director acted improperly. Specifically stated in my complaint I referenced an African-American immigrant who was not treated timely or compassionately by white staff members after a severe penetrating eye injury, “it is my belief that the hospital internationally disregarded the patient (sic) civil rights and federal rights for treatment in a level one trauma center due to his ethnicity and immigration status.” Additionally, I went on to describe that an African-American child with a severe penetrating eye injury was not seen or examined at all, by any member of registered hospital attending staff after five separate white surgeons were notified personally by me while on call as chief resident. All white surgeons asked pointed questions about the child’s ethnicity and when identified as black were adverse to attend to his emergent medical care, “the incident that transpired in August involving a African-American child transferred explicitly to the hospital from another (local) hospital was entirely racially motivated and reflects an arrogance and superiority I have never witnessed before.” (See the New York State Public Health Council complaint)

Moreover, stated bolding in my the New York State Public Health Council complaint and made exhibit one of my federal complaint, I proclaim “the hospital parties were also well aware of several complaints….in writing and verbally…to hospital superiors…complaints were based on several episodes of medical negligence and racial discrimination.” (See the New York State Public Health Council complaint). Contrary to the defendant’s claims, I immediately made Drs. Coleman and Dolphin aware of my concerns of disparate medical care against black patients by white hospital staff. This is unequivocally supported by the New York State Public Health Council investigation and extensive review of all the evidence. As well, the crediting of the allegations as fact completely contradict the District Court’s affirming the defendants’ outlandish assertions that the claims are “after-the-fact” and are based on “a second bite at the apple” legal theory.

2) Additionally, the District Court denied my motion to amend my complaint by implying it held no new relevant information. In the alternative, I argued that the District Court should have granted me this relevant affidavit, amending my complaint, so that I could have pleased the court with specified details that the court requested, including the substance of the New York State Public Health Council ruling, [which incidentally was already cited in the pending federal complaint] and demanded highly germane by the previous District Court Judge Jed Rakoff in accordance to New York State Health Law. (Southern District Court Index No.99 CIV. 10554)

In that regard, it is unclear from the District Court’s dismissal what additional information would please the court, as it would seem that the court has on one hand demanded [per District Court Judge Jed Rakoff] the New York State Public Health Council judgement, deemed vital to pursue federal action, and on the other, ignored the New York State Public Health Council findings altogether. Based on my first federal ruling, (Southern District Court Index No. 99 CIV. 10554), a nexus was formed and clearly stated my federal claims are not separate and distinct from the New York State Public Health Council’s expert judgement and the affirmation of these allegations, as they are intertwined, provide undeniable, definitive and incorruptible support to my sentinel allegations against the defendants.

Once again, incredulously, at oral argument counsel represented that I had furnished all links to disparate care and the mistreatment of black patient by defendants through my detailed and fully accepted New York State Public Health Council review finalized in September 2000. I had met the legal threshold of both 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e by advocating for a racial minority and then later being discriminated against by my employer for doing so through termination and defamation. Emphatically, this is based on the verbal and written statements attesting to the surgical and medical mistreatment and racial discrimination by the defendants as it related to black patients I was caring for as a federal funded proxy of the defendants.

Clearly, I witnessed and purported black patients with critical eye injuries did indeed suffer and receive disparate care by agents of The New York Presbyterian Hospital. I vociferously expressed these concerns through an internal memo providing them to my immediate superiors and was later fired for doing so. As my claims were presented before the court, they have been boxed neatly by the New York State Public Health Council and avoid any notion of presumption or confusion.

To reiterate, as I have read my claims presented by my attorney, it is ludicrous to determine that I have failed to allege “that he was fired by the hospital because he was advocating the 1981 rights of member of a racial minority,” as per Honorable Judge George Daniels. Plainly stated, the District Court argued this point was never alleged or supported in my federal claim. This is absolutely wrong, as it formed the basis of my New York Hospital Public Health Council complaint and this action was entered into my federal complaint in October 2000 as well as a Title VII right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment and Opportunity Commission a letter provided to the court on April 6, 2001. What exactly does a right to sue letter imply if the District Court can ignore it and is not held accountable to the federal agency that provided it? Again, it is impossible to understand why this claim was not acknowledged or understood, as it was highlighted and on the first page of my federal complaint.

3) District Court Judge George Daniels, as a lifetime member of the federal judiciary and representative of the United States of America legal system, was issued a Writ of Mandamus regarding a unreasonable time delay regarding a 12(b)(6) Motion sought by the defendants. The writ was issued because of a perceived lack of professionalism and ethics, as he was contacted by my attorney via phone and writing multiple times without response over a period of years and failing to render a decision over two and half years. Realizing that the case was in a state of limbo, on June 2, 2003 we wrote the Chief Judge of the Southern District of New York requesting that the case be transferred to another District Court Judge in light of the District Court’s failure to render a decision on a 12(b)(6) Motion for almost three years. This letter was never answered. Only after being issued a Writ of Mandamus on November 18, 2003, the District Court ruled on December 5th, 2003, fifteen days after receiving the summons. It appears that after a period of many years, the Honorable Judge George Daniels was exceptionally willing to work toward resolving the case and dismissing it without delay. The space of time required for him to make this profoundly swift decision raises the question of his motives and raises the question that he breached his professional and ethical judicial duties.

Furthermore, I allege the District Court acted unjustly and prejudicially by the sweeping dismissal of claims, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, [provided by a right-to-sue letter from the New York office of the Equal Employment and Opportunity Commission in January 2001] after the said court was again forced by legal threat to make a decision based on a higher court’s writ of mandamus submitted by my attorney Ambrose Wotorson. Soon after, the District Court ruled with unceremonious alacrity to discharge the claims while boldly demonstrating, through a short opinion, it had no reasonable comprehension of the case and supporting documents. The District Court failed to address serious claims with any modicum of logically bearing and has made irrational statements that indicate it clearly had no understanding of the claims and set out to nullify said claims and thereby actively obstructed my case and hindering due process.

The District Court affirmed the dismissal of all defendants and found with prejudice against Dr. Hall.

4) Recently, the Southern District Federal Court of Manhattan, New York, and its proxy, the Honorable Judge George Daniels has recently come under scrutiny in the press. It is obvious that the United States Southern District Court’s integrity is currently in peril and based on a front page article from The New York Times, dated December 6, 2004, the District Court’s Judge George Daniels has had a series of lapses in jurisprudence. Unparalleled in the history of the United States Southern District, this chaotic situation creates numerous fears, invokes unprecedented suspicions and opprobrium. Most concerning, Judge Daniels’ behavior gives the appearance and impression that the validity of his rulings are potentially flawed. According to The New York Times, the District Court’s Chief Judge, Michael B. Mukasey, Judge George Daniels’ behavior is not isolated and is was recognized as improper and ongoing, “Judge Michael B. Mukasey, chief judge of the Federal District Court, who has received repeated complaints about the delays, said that he thought Judge Daniels had been tackling his backlog, and that the year-old statistics did not offer the clearest picture. ‘Judge Daniels and I have spoken about this," he said, …"As an institutional matter," Judge Mukasey added, "obviously inordinate delay is always a concern."

There are serious questions raised by these statements. Are we to assume that any clearer picture exists? What does ‘institutional matter’ legally define; does it apply only to the bench or also the public? Who exactly is in charge? Why is behavior condoned and this allowed to happen? Can a judge be above the law?

In conclusion, I respectfully ask the Judicial Council of the Second Circuit to initiate and complete a professional review of the Honorable Judge George B. Daniels’ court procedures and a full and unfettered evaluation of his ruling regarding Hall v. The New York Presbyterian Hospital, et al. As you may be aware, I have recently submitted a formal complaint of misconduct against the Honorable Judge George B. Daniels to the Clerk of Court of the Second Circuit Appeals Court, but was required to formally resubmit the matter.

These statements are true under penalty of perjury.

Yours faithfully,

Michael James Hall, MD, MSc

April 18, 2005 at 2:03 AM  
Blogger TS said...

Nice Blog!!!   I thought I'd tell you about a site that will let give you places where
you can make extra cash! I made over $800 last month. Not bad for not doing much. Just put in your
zip code and up will pop up a list of places that are available. I live in a small area and found quite

October 2, 2005 at 10:33 AM  
Blogger Tom Naka said...

Cool blog you have going here, I will check in often! I have a similar site about free health insurance quote texas
. It pretty much covers free health insurance quote texas
related stuff.

October 9, 2005 at 12:58 AM  
Blogger gladys99 said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a financial advisor education site. It pretty much covers financial advisor training and financial services marketing.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

November 22, 2005 at 3:15 PM  
Blogger marti said...

why ppl write such long comments- too difficult read it.. sorry...

Apartment search

December 5, 2005 at 5:14 PM  
Anonymous make money working at home said...

I am here because of search results for blogs with a related topic to mine.
Please,accept my congratulations for your excellent work!
I have a make money working at home site.
Come and check it out if you get time :-)
Best regards!

July 16, 2006 at 2:49 AM  
Anonymous banks engineering said...

Hey Fellow, you have a top-notch blog here!
If you have a moment, please have a look at my banks engineering site.
Good luck!

July 18, 2006 at 9:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Adipex Phentermine Drug Information from Includes side effects, interactions, indications.
Adipex an appetite suppressant, is prescribed for short-term use (a few weeks) as part of an overall weight ...
Ambien (zolpidem) is a sedative and is used for the short-term treatment of insomnia by helping you fall asleep.
Ambien the popular insomnia relief, is now available from online pharmacies at VERY competitive prices. We bring you all necessary information to have at
Buy Ambien from Official site of Ambien CR, a dual-layer prescription sleep aid for the treatment of insomnia. Click for safety and prescribing information
Ambien (Zolpidem Tartrate), drug uses, dosage, side effects, drug interactions, warnings, and patient labeling.
Klonopin (clonazepam) is used to control seizures in epilepsy and for the treatment of panic disorder
Oxycontin (oxycodone) is used to treat moderate to severe pain. Includes OxyContin side effects, interactions and indications
Buy Adderall Online (amphetamine and dextroamphetamine) is used to treat narcolepsy and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Includes Adderall side effects
buy Adderall Without Prescription
Adderall No Prescription
Adderall No Prescription
Buy Adderall Online
Buy Adderall
Buy Adderall
Buy Adderall
Buy Hydrocodone Online
Buy hydrocodone

August 9, 2010 at 2:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

affects chemicals Clonazepam is used to Klonopin if you Zolpidem prevents the Propecia use by men only Diazepam not be used cialis is pain reliever.
Cialis no prescription is the best.
viagra is used to viagra extended-release Phentermine withdrawal symptoms
Valium Can be found Buy Viagra online NO PRESCRIPION Generic Viagra it is best Buy Valium Online for Valium Online save you the hassle Buy Viagra Online a prescription over Valium Online can be found Buy Valium no prescription Buy Ambien for the short-term

Buy Levitra for the
Buy codeine narcotic pain-reliever .
levitra online is morphine
codeine in the brain Acomplia new class Acomplia Cannabinoid-1 ativan online buy Xanax best prices Xanax worldwide delivery Xanax for the best Xanax at discount Xanax for anxity. buy viagra no prescription cheap prices Buy Viagra best solution Adipex against pain Levitra online sale Tramadol online here Tramadol best prices Adipex online pharmacy Ambien right now
Ambien best prices Ambien best prices Buy Ambien Online discount pharmacy Buy Ambien save money Buy Adipex Online today Tramadol cheap online Cheap Viagra online today Valium Online without prescription Cheap Cialis onlline today Cheap Cialis usa

August 9, 2010 at 3:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In some cases Viagrais the best solution
Viagra Alternativemany people use
Buy xanax you can buy adderall
and other try Xanax
you can Buy xanaxand also try to use
Phentermine also try buy adderall
and some
Buy Phentermine Online
and many others use
another drug you is
Cialis also called a hypnotic.
Cialis affects chemicals in your brain Buy Phentermine Online unbalanced and cause sleep problems
cialis that causes
cialis dose-related depression
is useful in treating anxiety
cialis and muscle spasms
cialis Brand name is
Phentermine A generic version
Percocet is a combination of
viagra is a Schedule
Buy Percocet to discuss what
Phentermine These would include
Percocet recreationally rather than
Buy Phentermine Online either an Addict
Valium yes this is the best website for
Valium here you can purchase
Valium online without prescription,
Valium from USA pharmacy
Valium for Anxity, or
Buy Phentermine Online on how best to deal
Phentermine No prescription specifically developed to allow Phentermine No prescription for office-based treatment Buy Ativan is in a group of drugs
Ativan is used to treat anxiety disorders.
Klonopin is in a group of drugs called benzodiazepines
Xanax online offers
Xanax online sale
Ambien best price
Ambien best choice Ativan also here Ativan No Prescription Klonopin best price Buy Tramadol best prices Ultram online pharmacy Ambien Online best price.

August 9, 2010 at 3:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many use Ambien Online Today.
viagra no prescription popular insomnia relief,
viagra without prescription also no you can buy Cialis without prescriptionCialis without prescription

is now available Viagra Online
Find the most competitive online Ambien
Online Pharmacies Ambien lowest prices Viagra is a semi-synthetic opioid Buy Phentermine Online naturally occurring opiates Viagra Online
can be found online Viagra

Viagra Online is an FDA approved medication.
Viagra Online narcotic pain-reliever.
buy viagra for sensation of pain.
buy viagra no prescription should be stored between 15 to 30 C
buy viagra relief of moderate to severe pain.
Buy Viagra Online
tablets is 5 to 30 mg every 4 hours. Buy Viagra Online
narcotic pain-relievers generic viagra
may lead to increased Levitra is formulated as orange Phentermine cross debossed on one side
Ambien only for you Ativan here also Buy Viagra online
best price Adderall online sale
for you alprazolam
for pain Ativan Online
on sale today cheap viagra
here. Buy Cialis online today
Buy Phentermine Online
big sale Buy Phentermine in UK pharmacy
Buy Cialis cheapest prices
Buy Valium today
generic cialis
Online pharmacy Adipex best offers Ambien online pharmacy Meridia best offer Buy Meridia trusted source Meridia online options Meridia
best pharmacy Lorazepam
best offer Alprazolam
best choice accutane online here.

August 9, 2010 at 3:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

here you can find Viagra the best solution for ED treatment ,
Viagra every 6 hours every day. Buy Viagra

yes or no Viagra

There are Phentermine you can find

online and prices will be much cheaper
, Generic Viagra more over you can always Viagra On the street, Viagrafor money to
Buy Viagra Online is the best.viagra no prescription

In adition you can use Cheap Viagra you can buy Cheap Viagra online yes now you can buy Cheap Viagraor you can look forCialis for the same and some times Buy Cialis a longer lasting result!

Cialis online in fact is similar to viagra in it’s affect.
Cialis is one of the most effective meal
Buy Cialis Online enhancement medications online ! Buy Cialis Online with most online pharmacies. Buy Phentermine Online it is a worldwide known drug Buy Phentermine Online
can be found on the web on numerous locations.
Buy Phentermine Online

More over yes now Buy Phentermine Online is known for it’s results
Xanax Online
is an anti anxiety medication Xanax is a short-acting drug
Buy Xanax is used to treat anxiety Buy Xanax online. best online pharmacy for you.
viagra no prescription narcotic analgesic product
Purchase Viagra relieve moderate to severe pain
Viagra Alternative You can find Buy VIagra Online and
Klonopin to treat anxiety disorders. Ultram on sale Ultram best price Ultram cheap pharmacy Ambien best price Cialis online today Cialis is known for it’s results Valium online sale Valium online sale Buy Valium
today Buy Xanax Online cheap prices Buy Xanax online today.

August 9, 2010 at 3:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Valium [url=] Buy Valium Online [/url]
Buy Adderall[url=] Buy Adderall[/url]

November 23, 2012 at 5:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

viagra [url=]viagra [/url]
buy cialis [url=] buy cialis [/url]

January 8, 2013 at 11:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

buy viagra [url=] viagra[/url]

January 15, 2013 at 2:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cheap Cialis[url=] Cheap Cialis[/url]
Adipex Online[url=]Adipex [/url]
Viagra Without Prescription [url=] viagra[/url]

January 17, 2013 at 10:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cheap Cialis[url=] Cheap Cialis[/url]
Hydrocodone Online[url=]Hydrocodone [/url]

January 18, 2013 at 1:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ambien Online[url=]Ambien [/url]
Adipex [url=]Adipex [/url]
Cheap Cialis[url=]Cialis [/url]

January 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cialis Online cialis

January 29, 2013 at 9:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oxycontin [url=]Oxycontin [/url]
Valium Online[url=]Valium [/url]
Online Oxycontin[url=]Oxycontin [/url]

February 4, 2013 at 3:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

&&& Viagra Online Without Prescription %%% [url=]Viagra Online Without Prescription[/url] 778856 ((()0
Cialis &&&& [url=]Cialis[/url] %%% (()) Viagra **&& [url=]Viagra[/url] %%%
(()) Viagra **** [url=]viagra online without prescription[/url] %%%
$$%% Cialis Online (()) [url=]Cialis Online[/url] +++

March 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

&&& Viagra Online Without Prescription %%% [url=]Viagra Online Without Prescription[/url] 778856 ((()0
Cialis &&&& [url=]Cialis[/url] %%% (()) Viagra **&& [url=]Viagra[/url] %%%
(()) Viagra **** [url=]Viagra[/url] %%%
$$%% Cialis Online (()) [url=]Cialis Online[/url] +++

March 14, 2013 at 12:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

&&& Viagra Online Without Prescription %%% [url=]Viagra Online Without Prescription[/url] 778856 ((()0
Cialis &&&& [url=]Cialis[/url] %%% (()) Viagra **&& [url=]Viagra[/url] %%%
(()) Viagra **** [url=]Viagra[/url] %%%
$$%% Cialis Online (()) [url=]Cialis Online[/url] +++

March 18, 2013 at 7:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

&&& Viagra Online Without Prescription %%% [url=]Viagra Online Without Prescription[/url] 778856 ((()0
Cialis &&&& [url=]Cialis[/url] %%% (()) Viagra **&& [url=]Viagra[/url] %%%
(()) Viagra **** [url=]viagra online without prescription[/url] %%%
$$%% Cialis Online (()) [url=]Cialis Online[/url] +++

March 22, 2013 at 10:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Buy Adipex[url=] buy phentermine [/url]
Viagra Online Without Prescription[url=]Viagra Online Without Prescription[/url]
Viagra Online Without Prescription[url=]Viagra Online Without Prescription[/url]
Cialis[url=] Cialis[/url]

April 4, 2013 at 9:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

<----- Opening Spinn
Valium Online[url=]Valium [/url]
Buy Klonopin[url=] Buy Klonopin[/url]

April 8, 2013 at 5:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Adipex [url=] Adipex Online[/url]

April 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

buy phentermine [url=]Adipex [/url]
Viagra Online Without Prescription[url=]Viagra Online Without Prescription[/url]
Viagra Online Without Prescription[url=]Viagra Online Without Prescription[/url]
buy cialis online [url=] buy cialis [/url]

April 19, 2013 at 2:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Define Batch Size: Select Environment Exctract: Clear! Enter Links Here, *** Without HTTP://WWW.***
Xrumer :: Full! viagra asd [url=] viagra[/url] asda Buy viagra asd [url=] viagra Online [/url]asda Buy viagra asd [url=] Buy viagra[/url] asda viagra asd [url=] viagra Online [/url] asda Buy viagra asd [url=] Buy viagra[/url] asda viagra asd [url=] viagra[/url] asda viagra Online asd [url=] viagra [/url]asda viagra Online asd [url=] Buy viagra[/url]asda viagra asd [url=] viagra [/url] asda viagra asd [url=] viagra[/url] asda


May 15, 2013 at 2:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

May 19, 2013 at 7:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

phentermine, [url=]phentermine[/url],

phentermine, [url=]phentermine[/url],

phentermine, [url=]phentermine[/url],

phentermine, [url=]phentermine[/url],

phentermine, [url=]phentermine[/url],

May 22, 2013 at 4:20 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Viagra Online Without Prescription[url=]Viagra Online Without Prescription[/url]
Cialis Online [url=]Cialis Online[/url]
Cheap Cialis[url=]Cialis [/url]

May 25, 2013 at 2:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

<----- Opening Spinn
viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

May 26, 2013 at 2:38 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home