Friday, March 20, 2009

For Your Information

United States v. Morales, No. 07-4202-cr (2d Cir. March 18, 2009) (per curiam)

Morales was charged in a two count drug indictment; one count had a 5-year mandatory minimum, under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B), while the other had a 10-year mando under § 841(b)(1)(A). Before trial, the government filed a prior felony information pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851(a)(1). This had the effect of doubling the mandatory minimum to which Morales was exposed. But the information specifically indicated that Morales would be subject to the “enhanced penalties of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841(a), 841(b)(1)(B) and 851.” After trial, but before sentencing, when it is otherwise to late to file an information, the government filed an amended information referencing § 841(b)(1)(A).

At sentencing, Morales complained that he went to trial because he believed that the only mandatory minimum he faced was 10 years: the 5 years under § 841(b)(1)(B) - which was doubled by the prior felony information - and the 10 years under § 841(b)(1)(A), which he indicated he believed the government had refrained from doubling in an exercise of its discretion. Not an unreasonable thought, since the defendant was, at the time, 67 years old.

The government, on its part, noted that § 851 does not require that a prior felony information identify the statutory basis of the proposed enhancement at all. It claimed that it had simply made a clerical error, and that the amended information corrected the error, which is expressly permitted by the language of § 851(a)(1). The district court agreed, found that Morales was subject to a 20-year mandatory minimum, and imposed it.

On appeal, the circuit vacated for further findings. It agreed that § 851 does not require the government to specify the basis of the enhancement or its length, but looked beyond the language of the statute to determine its purpose. In fact, § 851 has two purposes. The first, not implicated here, is to allow the defendant to contest the accuracy of the claim that he has a prior felony conviction. But the second, inherent in the statute’s requirement that the information be filed before trial or the entry of a guilty plea, is that the defendant is supposed to have “ample time to determine whether to enter a plea or go to trial and plan his trial strategy with full knowledge of the consequences of a potential verdict.” After all, if an opportunity to question the prior conviction were all that was required, “notice after conviction but prior to sentencing would suffice.”

Accordingly, the court held that “a prior felony information that, like this one, could mislead a defendant as to the minimum penalty he or she would face after a jury’s conviction undermines Congressional intent.” Given this, it is “not possible to determine the appropriate remedy, if any, until it is known whether the mistake in the prior felony information adversely affected defendant’s decision to go to trial or his trial strategy.” The court therefore remanded the case to the district court for further findings on “(1) whether defendant understood the citation to 841(b)(1)(B) and the absence of a citation to 841(b)(1)(A) as an indication that the government had elected not to seek Section 841(b)(1)(A)’s higher mandatory minimum; and (2) if so, whether defendant’s misapprehension adversely affected trial strategy or triggered a decision to go to trial rather than to accept or seek a plea bargain.”

In a footnote, the appellate court also pointed out that the district court could still impose a 20-year sentence, even if it concluded that Morals was not subject to a 20-year mandatory minimum.



Anonymous Anonymous said...

1cialis levitra viagra vs vs [url=]arimidex breast cancer[/url]buy tadalafil prescription drug online
2 street name for oxycodone [url=]arimidex prescribing information[/url]buy tadalafil prescription pill online
20 cheap generic mg nolvadex [url=]doctors against arimidex[/url]buy tadalafil with check online
20 mg cialis dose advice [url=]arimidex muscle[/url]buy tadalafil with no prescription
20 mg photo of levitra [url=]arimidex reactions with antidepressants[/url]buy tadalafil without a prescription
2001 daily feb levitra statistics [url=]arimidex and running[/url]buy tadalafil without prescription online
2003 case studies of cialis [url=]sideffects of arimidex[/url]buy u s tadalafil online
20mg ambien or 20mg zolpidem [url=]treatment bone pain arimidex[/url]buy ultracet cash on delivery
20mg generic levitra order online [url=]about arimidex[/url]buy valacyclovir generic valtrex canada
20mg oxycodone extended release price [url=]arimidex while on deca[/url]buy valtrex online in australia

January 27, 2010 at 5:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

who can take clomid | clomid 50 mg for men - 50mg clomid, secondary infertility clomid

November 14, 2012 at 10:05 AM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

oakley sunglasses cheap, coach outlet store online, kate spade outlet, air max pas cher, louboutin outlet, louis vuitton outlet stores, longchamp handbags, christian louboutin shoes, prada outlet, burberry outlet, ray ban sunglasses, air max, coach factory outlet, tiffany and co, prada handbags, michael kors outlet, tory burch outlet, kate spade handbags, polo ralph lauren outlet, louis vuitton handbags, burberry outlet, michael kors outlet, true religion outlet, louis vuitton outlet, louis vuitton, michael kors outlet, louboutin, chanel handbags, michael kors outlet, louboutin shoes, michael kors outlet, longchamp handbags, longchamp outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet, nike shoes, tiffany and co, coach outlet, true religion jeans, true religion jeans, nike free, air max, coach purses, air max, michael kors outlet, gucci outlet, ray ban sunglasses, louis vuitton outlet, jordan shoes

October 28, 2014 at 2:02 AM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

abercrombie and fitch, nike roshe run, nike free pas cher, longchamp, mac cosmetics, hogan outlet, nike free, polo ralph lauren, sac burberry, michael kors pas cher, hollister, polo lacoste, nike tn, sac hermes, nike huarache, nike roshe, north face, sac longchamp, new balance pas cher, louis vuitton, vanessa bruno, longchamp, vans shoes, louis vuitton uk, air max, ray ban sunglasses, north face, nike blazer, nike roshe run, air jordan, sac guess, vans pas cher, barbour, oakley pas cher, nike air max, sac louis vuitton, lululemon, mulberry, michael kors, sac louis vuitton, ralph lauren, hollister, hollister, nike trainers, michael kors, ray ban pas cher, air force, converse pas cher, timberland, louboutin

October 28, 2014 at 2:02 AM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

lululemon outlet, mont blanc, air max, nfl jerseys, rolex watches, beats by dre, moncler, new balance shoes, bottega veneta, ugg, ugg australia, hollister clothing store, giuseppe zanotti, wedding dresses, iphone 6 cases, canada goose, ugg boots, ghd, reebok outlet, ferragamo shoes, chi flat iron, moncler, north face jackets, soccer shoes, ugg boots, abercrombie and fitch, babyliss pro, baseball bats, valentino shoes, uggs outlet, ugg pas cher, insanity workout, instyler, moncler outlet, canada goose uk, north face outlet, moncler, canada goose, marc jacobs, canada goose, herve leger, asics running shoes, canada goose jackets, birkin bag, canada goose outlet, soccer jerseys, p90x, jimmy choo outlet, mcm handbags, celine handbags

October 28, 2014 at 2:03 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home