Wednesday, January 05, 2011

PC World

United States v. Brown, No. 09-4991 (2d Cir. January 5, 2011) (Calabresi, Sack, Katzmann, CJJ) (per curiam)

The court's latest per curiam holds that assaulting a correction officer, in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. ยง 53a-167c(a), satisfies the "catch-all" definition of "violent felony" in the Armed Career Criminal Act. Under Circuit law, an offense qualifies under the catch-all if it is both similar "in kind" and in "degree of risk posed" to the listed offenses of burglary, arson, extortion and the use of explosives.

The Connecticut offense is similar "in kind" because it requires the offender to intentionally prevent an officer from performing his duties, primarily in a prison setting, where "the act of injuring an employee for the purpose of preventing her from performing her official duties tends to entail especially violent consequences."

As for the degree of risk posed, the court noted that the statute only applies where the officer has suffered physical injury. This "certainty" of "injury to another" clearly meets the statutory definition.

Labels: ,


Anonymous iPhone Accessories said...

Nice post!You are true when you say this. I think very few individuals will accept this issue openly and then deal with it so well. Keep on posting!!! 2945abc45 0128

January 27, 2011 at 9:24 PM  
Blogger warlam said...

the courts are always right? ah?

order phentermine now

February 3, 2012 at 1:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

viagra, [url=]viagra[/url],

June 5, 2013 at 11:05 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home